Report Inappropriate Comments

Cat, don't let the two-time election reject's attempts to twist your words get to you.

He's trying to use your words to justify his delusional and false statements.

"However if we just reversed the massive raises and new appointments... the School Committee just gave themselves..."

The school committee did not "give themselves massive raises." The five members of the school committee receive a total of $20,100 in annual stipends -- the information, which the two-time election reject has clearly never read, is on page 22 at this link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fx77pF3qwnMI8EERaRPK3CqSmIJTeL4E/view

There were no "new appointments," those were administrators from other schools who were moved to the consolidated middle and high schools.

And in fact, page 17 of that budget document shows a reduction of two administrators for a savings of $250,000.

"My only add-on is that it should come from the excessive overcharges (in my opinion) from the School Committee."

The two-time election reject's opinion is based on ignoring publicly available and easily verifiable information about the school budget -- there are no "excessive overcharges," the school committee did not give themselves "massive raises," and there were no "new appointments."

The actual reason for the increased school budget is -- as it has been in the past -- the teacher salary increases that the two-time election reject repeatedly supported in his comments over the past two years that shamelessly pandered to the WTU and made false accusations against the school committee.

We and thousands of our honest, taxpaying neighbors are having a happy autumn knowing that we were 100% justified in rejecting the candidacy of the two-time election reject.