Weather Forecast
50°, overcast
Scal, what an odd comment by allent. He seems to think it's "strange" that most commenters disagree with the two-time failure unless it can be explained by some kind of conspiracy theory.
In the end, the point remains that the two-time sore loser could have conducted himself very differently but chose not to, and he lost as a direct result of that decision.
[And by the way, aren't conspiracy theories about commenters' identities something the two-time election loser has tried to push?]
Please explain the inappropriate content below.