Report Inappropriate Comments

Dear Nathan Cornell and PaulHuff,

You're both right. Nathan says "there is no legitimate reason to extend" and Paul says "With a little more life experience you will realize that workers perform better when they have job security". I believe Nathan is speaking from the point of the taxpayers when he says there is no legitimate reason [from the TAXPAYERS POINT OF VIEW]. There IS a legitimate reason from the point of view of the School Committee (SC). They want to control their future, not let the taxpayers decide, because the taxpayers MIGHT not be so accommodating. Paul, put that contract extension issue on the ballot and see if there are ten voters that agree with it! Nathan might not "know what he doesn't know" but he does have a great sense of fair play. It is that great quality added to his diligence that will get him elected. Then he will learn what he "doesn't know". The result will be a school committee member that puts the taxpayers needs AHEAD of the needs of the SC. As for the rest, I think Nathan is a fast learner and he will get the same help from the rest of the SC, that any new member receives. Paul, I think you will see that Nathan isn't "anti-administration". He's just "pro-taxpayer".

Happy Summer everyone.

Rick Corrente

The Taxpayers Mayor