Report Inappropriate Comments

Bg9385:

Now that you've admitted to attending the WTU meeting last week, maybe you can focus more on getting your colleagues to sign a contract instead of preaching about journalistic integrity. Maybe if you and fellow WTU members were not trying to say so many things -- there was a discussion that got squashed, there was a prolonged debate, there was no discussion -- the information being published would be less confusing.

But that's not really the WTU's intent, is it? No. It's not to provide factual information to the parents. It's to run a PR campaign based on misdirection.

As a result, we get a union that rejects an approved contract [one that the mayor worked on] and then cries that it doesn't have a contract; that says it's for the kids but closes two schools; has 140 of its members call out sick but insists it's not a "sick out," and that claims it's being treated unfairly after two-plus years of digging in its heels.

So, go ahead and keep denying what reasonable and alert readers are seeing for themselves. On this site, at least, you'll find yourself in the same league as the fake "mayor."