Report Inappropriate Comments

wwkvoter, here's how debate actually works: Someone sets out a premise, and then supports it with fact.

Here is my premise: I never said anything different than "they are all to blame."

And here is evidence to support it...

- A past comment of mine from June 17, where I say specifically that "they are all to blame."

http://warwickonline.com/stories/solomon-school-sports-will-remain-in-place,143117

- A link from June 6 where I state: "I know Avedisian negotiated the contracts; I know he ran the city day-to-day; and I know he proposed tax increases every year -- but the council's job was to review those contracts, oversee city operations, and change and approved those budgets."

http://warwickonline.com/stories/council-passes-3228m-budget,142832

- A link from March 26 where I state "the city council is at least as responsible as Avedisian for failing to do their jobs," agreeing with the Beacon editorial that said exactly the same thing.

http://warwickonline.com/stories/no-shortage-of-blame-in-pension-reform-debacle,140937

Making accusations against someone else without proof -- especially when the evidence disproves their accusations -- is not "debate."

All Get Real showed was that s/he doesn't understand plain English, and instead just wants to distract people from the current office holders' mismanagement of the city.