Weather Forecast
52°, overcast
The two-time election reject, as predicted, replies with more delusional and pathetic statements.
"An opinion is an opinion and you can agree or dispute it but you can't call an opinion a 'lie.'"
This entire statement is false.
The two-time election reject presented a series of statements that were then shown to be factually and objectively untrue.
Did he write "In my opinion, the number of teachers and buildings were significantly reduced?"
No, he wrote a declarative statement that is false.
He then writes an entire paragraph stating his "opinion" on a former city chief of staff who left the city in 2014 and is not using this screen name -- something the two-time election reject has never, by his own admission, contacted Mr. Carruolo to confirm.
[Alert readers will also notice that the two-time election reject was the first to mention Mr. Carruolo on this page, not anyone else -- another shameless lie that serves to prove only his unlimited capacity to behave in a disgraceful fashion.]
His "opinion" in this case is a series of false accusations and conspiracy theories that he refuses to research on his own, and instead tries to distract readers with name-calling and more lies.
The two-time election reject is also, again, lying when he calls himself anyone's "mayor." On two occasions, majorities of honest, taxpaying voters rejected his candidacy by overwhelming and humiliating margins, leaving him to use a fictional title for himself that he neither earned nor deserves.
His bluster and juvenile behavior does not change the facts that he lied about in his first comment, and will not do anything to change the minds of honest, taxpaying readers about him, namely that we were 100% correct to reject his candidacy twice.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
