Report Inappropriate Comments

Justanidiot, I would rather write in your name than the two-time election reject, who still can not restrain himself from repeating his long-disproven statements.

"Will it be spent on the needed repairs? There is NO GUARANTEE."

We know this is a lie. Mayor Solomon has publicly stated his commitment -- complete with a specific list of renovations to be made -- to spend the bond money according to the plan presented, in public, by the school committee.

The two-time election reject's mistrust of the school committee -- for apparently no other reason than he wants to pander to the teachers union -- will not be the basis for anyone's vote on the school bonds.

And his continued complaining about "no 'Clerk-of-the-Works'" is a further sign of his delusional beliefs, since there is no law or statute that requires a paid, redundant school department position to oversee how the bonds are spent.

"This is $40 million MORE!"

His juvenile all-caps yelling aside, the two-time election reject continues to ignore how 90+ percent of the school budget pays for teacher salaries and benefits -- including $4.5 million of the FY19 request from the school committee.

"Did they spend it wisely?"

Given that the two-time election reject repeatedly supported the new teacher contract [and the salary increases included in it], he is contradicting his own prior statements while continuing to ignore the annual, independently conducted audits that are published every year.

As is typical for him, the two-time election reject buries a small kernel of truth in a list of false statements:

"Don't be fooled."

Honest, taxpaying voters have not been fooled by him -- leading to his distinction as the only candidate in at least a generation to lose to two mayors from two different parties -- and they will not be fooled by him on Question 1.