Report Inappropriate Comments

If you read the three questions above they all sound so noble. On the ballot they will sound even better! They sound like "these propositions hold the keys for huge potential for growth in the states educational and economic outlook for many years to come." That's fine if the money actually was spent the way it is described. It seldom is. Don't be fooled.

I will only comment on Question 1, which includes $40 million for the Warwick School Committee and acting Mayor Solomon to have control over. Will it be spent on the needed repairs? There is NO GUARANTEE. Was the $25 million from 2006 spent on the needed repairs?? Taxpayers paid over double including interest and was it spent wisely? I don't think so.

For the record, in my lifetime, I have never seen one piece of legislation that was worth the money the taxpayers paid. Have you? If you agree with me, then just vote "No".

I'm reading Justanidiots wise words and I agree 100%. Your "kids and grandkids are paying off this debt." Don't saddle them with it.

I will be voting against Question 1 as it applies to the $40,000,000 for Warwick with no "Clerk-of-the-Works" to safeguard the taxpayers. I invite the "80,000 taxpayers that are paying the tab" to do the same. Remember, this isn't $40 million. This is $40 million MORE! The School Committee has already received over ONE AND A HALF BILLION DOLLARS SINCE 2009. Did they spend it wisely?

Happy Autumn everyone.

Rick Corrente

The Taxpayers Mayor