Report Inappropriate Comments

Unionman,

Im gonna go out on a limb here,

The article that you point to in the Beacon describing $636,000 in concessions is obviously public information, which means that , that information was gained during a council meeting where it was discussed and voted on. For the Beacon to have that information, it was made public, and clearly obtained during an open meeting. The Beacon, and no other entity had the information of the "side deal" of sick time. It was never discussed in an open forum, it was never voted on , and it was never passed. Tharts the difference between what is legal and what is not.

I certainly hope that you understand that I was not sitting on the Supreme Court when the case precedent was passed. I also was not part of the legal system that ratified the Warwick City Charter. I am only part of the funding formula and frankly, I have a vested interest in how my money is spent. Dont blame me, call Peter Ruggiero.