Weather Forecast
63°, mostly cloudy
Phillip, please stop giving the two-time loser any reason to feel that he's saying anything credible. He is talking about a fiscal audit, which is different than the legally-prescribed program audit that the school committee has conducted.
The city already pays for a fiscal audit every year, and the school department publishes it, ever year. Every fiscal audit shows that the school department is properly managing its budget under current auditing standards.
There is no fiscal mismanagement happening, as determined by then independent third-party audit done every year. Another fiscal audit done right now would show nothing different than every other one that has already been conducted.
Despite what the two-time loser keeps saying, the school committee is following the law when it comes to fiscal and program audits.
He is wrong -- objectively, factually wrong -- to suggest otherwise.
He is wrong to suggest that any random CPA, who is looking at it from a fiscal audit standpoint, is qualified to determine the validity of a program audit.
He is wrong to demand that other people call a fiscal auditing firm and ask them about an educational program audit.
All you're doing is encouraging him to keep posting his conspiracy theories and false statements, and showing honest, taxpaying voters that they were right to reject his candidacy last week.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
