Report Inappropriate Comments

You know what's curious to me, Scal? It's how commenters like Phillip try to direct the conversation away from the make-believe mayor's many defects as a candidate and to discuss his disgrace of a campaign reasonably.

Problem is, there is no reasonable way to discuss the make-believe mayor's candidacy.

His "plans" are empty slogans with no substance.

His financial history is littered with delinquencies, lost court cases, and ethically questionable campaign finance activities, like paying campaign funds to rent an office from the same person who paid the taxes on his former residence.

He just filed a campaign finance report yesterday that shows $24.14 remaining, after paying $9.99 in bank fees since July 1 and collecting $0 in campaign contributions: https://bit.ly/2vORzye

This is not the sign of a reasonable candidate, 28 days before a primary.

By comparison, acting Mayor Solomon raised another $38,380 in individual contributions and spent nearly $21,000 on his campaign, leaving him with $232,245: https://bit.ly/2MxrPjx

Even Gerald Carbone, a first-time candidate, leads the make-believe mayor in funding with $5,573.

[Vincent Ferla filed an exemption stating that he will neither raise nor spend more than $100 on his campaign.]

All the make-believe mayor has done, in reality, is recycle the claims and slogans that he used in his losing 2016 bid, as if they will somehow end in a different result this year.

As is typical for him, he is wrong. His 2018 campaign is just a cheaper copy of his 2016 run that will result in exactly the same kind of overwhelming loss that he suffered two years ago.