Report Inappropriate Comments

To your first point, WwkVoter: I plan to continue to use a screen name on this website, despite the make-believe mayor's whining about it and his insistence that the facts we present are somehow not true because we use screen names.

Thanks for bringing that Warwick Post article back to the attention of readers here, too. You may recall that in response, the make-believe mayor falsely claimed that Rob Borkowski was the city GOP chairman, another in the long, long list of instances where he humiliated himself through his lies.

We should know soon what the Board of Elections decided to do about the complaint against the make-believe mayor; he has claimed [typically for him, with no evidence] that the former BoE chairman sent him an email clearing him of any wrongdoing. This is also not the process that the BoE follows to consider campaign finance violations, so the make-believe mayor is compounding his ethically questionable campaign finance activities by inventing Board of Elections procedures.

What your very astute observation proves is that, no matter how many times the make-believe mayor tries, he will not fool the voters of Warwick. His claimed "plans" to "bring back taxpayers" are nothing more than giving away city funds and borrowing against future revenue to pay for it -- mortgaging the future of the city, in other words. And since it has been repeatedly proven that he is not paying the taxes on his residence, he would be gambling with other peoples' money -- not his own -- to fund his delusional ideas.

And one other point: His premise -- that "new taxpayers" will increase city revenue -- is erroneous. Whether by the residents or another entity that owns a property [as in the make-believe mayor's case], taxes are already paid on homes and businesses in Warwick. While properties are for sale, taxes are paid by banks or management companies. Thus, adding more taxpayers would not substantially change the amount of tax revenue going to the city, since they would simply be paying the tax bills that are already being paid.

Now that you and Scal and I have once again disproven the make-believe mayor's claims, we can expect that he will abandon this comment board and use a new article to repeat them, instead of answering for the factual proof of his tax delinquency. [Calling those facts "fake" is not a legitimate answer, except in the delusional mind of the make-believe mayor.]